SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 872

S.C.SHARMA
Paraschand – Appellant
Versus
Rao Rajendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vishal Baheti
For the Respondents: A.S. Kutumble, Senior Counsel and Anand Singh

Judgment:

S.C. Sharma, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19-2-2014 passed in COS No. 15-A/2012. By the aforesaid order, the trial Court has allowed the application for amendment preferred under Order 6, Rule 17 of Civil Procedure Code. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the trial Court has erred in law and in fact in allowing the amendment application in spite of the fact that the trial Court has arrived at a conclusion that the plaintiff was having the knowledge of the facts which were mentioned in the amendment application and the plaintiff could have raised the matter before commencement of trial. Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed for quashment of the aforesaid order.

2. On the other hand, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the respondent has argued before this Court that the application for amendment has rightly been allowed by the trial Court, as in order to decide the controversy, the amendment was necessary.

3. Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance upon a judgment delivered by the Apex Court in the case of Rajkumar Gurawara (Dead) Through














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top