SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 1059

D.K.PALIWAL
Ramesh Kevat – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:J.P. Mishra, Advocate.
For Respondents/Defendant: Nutan Saxena, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

D.K. Paliwal, J.

1. This revision petition has been preferred under Sections 397, 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ganj Basoda, District Vidisha, in Sessions Trial No. 42 of 2014 on 28.2.2014, whereby charge under Section 304 Part II of IPC (on two counts) has been framed against the petitioner.

2. The facts in brief giving rise to this revision petition are that on 6.5.2013 Rajendra Singh has informed Vishan Singh that two persons are lying dead. A motorcycle bearing registration No. MP 40 BA 7580 is also lying nearby. It seems that death of the deceased has taken place due to vehicular accident. The marriage invitation card is also lying at the spot in which the mobile number is printed, hence, he is informing him (Vishan Singh). Upon this information, Vishan Singh reached the spot where Rajendra told him that accident has taken place from a dumper which was going towards Vidisha and both the deceased were going towards Pipaldhar from the side of Vidisha. The dead-bodies were identified as Narayan Singh Rajput and Chandrabhan Singh Rajput who were the uncle and cousin brother of Vishan Singh. On this info










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top