SUBHASH KAKADE
Mehatlal – Appellant
Versus
Imla Alias Seema – Respondent
Heard.
2. This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed by the applicant being aggrieved by the order dated 05/05/2014 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Balaghat in Criminal Revision No.176/2013 and Criminal Revision No.173/2013.
3. After perusal of the impugned order and other documents available on record following facts are not disputed by the parties; hence detailed pleadings are not required to be discussed as mentioned in the usual course in the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.: -
That, the respondent No.1 is legally wedded wife of the applicant and marriage was performed on 20.5.2004 according to Hindu rites and rituals.
That, the respondents No.2 & 3 are children of this couple.
That the applicant is posted as Teacher at I.T.I. Balaghat.
That as per his salary certificate for the month of July, 2013, the applicant was getting a total emolument Rs.29042/-, out of which after deduction, he was getting Rs.23,592/- per month cash in hand.
4. Shri S.B. Shrivastava, learned counsel for the applicant mainly pointing out the errors committed by learned Revision Court while passing the impugned order dated 05/05/2014 submits that the res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.