SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 493

ROHIT ARYA
Rajaram – Appellant
Versus
Sarju Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:J.P. Mishra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Rohit Arya, J.

1. Heard on the question of admission.

2. The instant appeal by appellants/defendants under Section 100 of C.P.C. is directed against the concurring judgment and decree dated 27/6/2009 passed by First Additional District Judge, Mungawali, District Ashok Nagar (M.P.) in Civil Appeal No. 1-A/2007; confirming the judgment and decree dated 30/11/2006 passed by Civil Judge, Class-II, Mungawali in Civil Suit No. 589-A/1998. By the aforesaid judgment, the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction has been decreed.

3. Plaintiff filed a suit inter alia contending that agricultural land ad-measuring 1.010 hectare falling in survey No. 350/2 in village Ghatbamuria is of her ownership and possession, whereupon she is ploughing the field and harvesting crops. As defendants have their agricultural land adjacent to suit land, therefore, off and on, they apprehend plaintiff for forcible dispossession, therefore, under such circumstances, the instant suit for declaration and permanent injunction has been filed.

4. Defendants filed written statement denying the plaint allegations. It is inter alia contended that the suit land is neither of the ownership nor in po




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top