SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(MP) 1386

N.K.MODY
Jagdishchandra – Appellant
Versus
Hind Spinners – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sunil Jain for Petitioner
Mr. R.T. Thanewala for Respondent

Judgment

Hon'ble N.K. Mody. J. :

1. This order shall also govern the disposal of Cr.R. Nos. 693/08 and 694/08 filed by the petitioner and Cr.R. Nos. 945/08, 946/08 and 947/08 filed by the respondent. In all the Criminal Revisions parties are one and the same and question involved is also one and the same, therefore, all these petitions are being disposed of by one order.

2. All the Revision Petitions are against the judgment dated 16.6.2008 passed by Sessions Judge, Indore, whereby the judgment dated 20.11.2007 passed by Special Magistrate, Dewas whereby petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (which shall be referred hereinafter as an Act) was set aside.

3. Short facts of the case are that the respondent filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act alleging that the respondent company who is complainant herein is the sister concern of M/s. Hind Spinners Ltd. and is in business of production and sale of synthetic cloth. It was alleged that petitioner company had a business of production of synthetic cloth. It was alleged that for its business petitioner company has to purchase the synthetic yarn from the respondent company. It was alleged that th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top