SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(MP) 959

TARUN KUMAR KAUSHAL
Ramu Chakarwarti – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Vinod Kumar Rishi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Shri Alok Tapikar, Panel Lawyer.

Judgment

This is an application for bail under section 439 of Cr.P.C. for offence under Sections 25/27 of Arms Act in connection with Crime No.484/2014 registered at Police Station Garha, District Jabalpur.

2. According to prosecution, on 13.05.2014 police Garha apprehended petitioner with four revolvers and four live cartridges.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since about one month and seizure suffers from material discrepancies.

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is a habitual criminal having so many cases pending against him.

5. In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since about 6-7 years no new cases have been registered against the petitioner so far and all old cases have been disposed of in favour of the petitioner and he has not been convicted in any case so far. Without commenting on merits of the case, on due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it proper to grant bail to the petitioner with condition that on each and every date of hearing, petitioner shall ensure his presence in trial court, failing which petitioner shall be liable for cancellation of thi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top