SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 761

SUJOY PAUL
Nawal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
T. C. Singhal for petitioner; Shashank Indapurkar for respondents.

ORDER

1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 18.3.2015 (Annexure P-1), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from BSF Tekanpur to Eastern Command.

2. Draped in brevity, the relevant facts are that the petitioner is working as Instructor and was transferred by order dated 7.3.2012 (Annexure R-1) from STC BSF Bangalore to BSF Academy Tekanpur. In obedience of said order, petitioner joined at Gwalior. Petitioner is suffering from some psychological disorder for which his treatment is going on at Gwalior.

3. Shri Singhal raised singular contention. He relied on statutory rules namely “Border Security Force (Tenure of Posting and Deputation Amendment) Rules, 2002” (Rules of 2002), to contend that as per proviso of rule 3, the petitioner has a right to continue at transferred place for four years. It is submitted that petitioner has not completed four years, therefore his transfer runs contrary to the Rules of 2002.

4. Shri Shashank Indapurkar, learned counsel for the respondents, fairly admits that although the said rules are applicable, the fact remains that while transferring the petitioner by order dated 7.3.2012 (Annexure R-1), a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top