SUJOY PAUL
Nawal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 18.3.2015 (Annexure P-1), whereby the petitioner has been transferred from BSF Tekanpur to Eastern Command.
2. Draped in brevity, the relevant facts are that the petitioner is working as Instructor and was transferred by order dated 7.3.2012 (Annexure R-1) from STC BSF Bangalore to BSF Academy Tekanpur. In obedience of said order, petitioner joined at Gwalior. Petitioner is suffering from some psychological disorder for which his treatment is going on at Gwalior.
3. Shri Singhal raised singular contention. He relied on statutory rules namely “Border Security Force (Tenure of Posting and Deputation Amendment) Rules, 2002” (Rules of 2002), to contend that as per proviso of rule 3, the petitioner has a right to continue at transferred place for four years. It is submitted that petitioner has not completed four years, therefore his transfer runs contrary to the Rules of 2002.
4. Shri Shashank Indapurkar, learned counsel for the respondents, fairly admits that although the said rules are applicable, the fact remains that while transferring the petitioner by order dated 7.3.2012 (Annexure R-1), a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.