SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 821

C.V.SIRPURKAR
Awdhesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Moghe – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri A.S. Parihar.
For the Respondent: Shri Amit Bhurrak.

JUDGMENT :

C.V. Sirpurkar, J.

1. This is a criminal appeal against acquittal filed on behalf of the complainant. It is directed against the order dated 07.08.2009 passed by the Court of JMFC, Bhopal in criminal case no. 13655/2007.

2. This is a peculiar case. In the operating paragraphs of the impugned judgment, it has been observed that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is found to have been proved against the accused and the bail bonds of the accused were discharged but no order convicting the accused was passed and no sentence was imposed.

3. A perusal of the impugned judgment reveals that the respondent/accused Sanjay and his wife had borrowed Rs. 3,50,000/- from complainant Awdhesh Singh on the condition that they would return the same in 4 to 5 months. In respect of aforesaid amount, the accused had issued 3 cheques, one in the sum of Rs. 2 lacs and two in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- each on 19.09.2007. When the cheque in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- was presented to the bank, it was returned with an endorsement that the concerned account has been closed. The complainant issued a notice through his Advocate on 28.09.2007, which was served upon the accus









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top