SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 422

ANAND PATHAK
Ballu @ Balveer Jatav – Appellant
Versus
Prembai – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Soni for petitioner; Ashish Saraswal, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Petition is heard finally.

2. The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 15.6.2018 passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Kolaras, District Shivpuri, whereby jail warrant has been issued against the petitioner.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondent No. 1 Prembai filed a complaint before Naib Tahsildar under section 250 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 alleging about the forcible possession as encroacher taken by the petitioner over the land belonging to the respondent No. 1 Premabai. Naib Tahsildar vide order dated 21.8.2017 allowed the application of respondent No. 1 and directed to pay Rs. 13,750/- and further direction was given to the petitioner to vacate the possession, else petitioner had to face consequences of civil jail under section 250(A) of the Code.

4. The said order was put to challenge by the petitioner before the Sub-Division Officer and the appeal was pending, but still as per petitioner, order dated 15.6.2018 has been passed, wherein jail warrant has been issued against the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that impugned order suffers from reason as the order is not a speaking order. He r







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top