SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 269

S.K.GANGELE, ANJULI PALO
Dinesh Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
Vandana Tripathi – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Appellant present in person.

JUDGMENT

Palo, J--1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant-husband under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 14.3.2007 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Rewa in Civil Suit No. 49-A/2005 whereby the suit filed by the appellanthusband for decree of divorce was dismissed.

2. It is not in dispute that the marriage between the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife was solemnized on 11.5.2003.

3. The appellant's case in short is that after marriage on 21.5.2003, the respondent went to her maternal house along with her brothers. She returned to her matrimonial house after 4-5 months. She started practicing witch-craft. The appellant provided her medical treatment. On 29.2.2004 at about 9:00 am, some unsocial elements came at his house to take him. The parents of the respondent wanted to sacrifice (bali chadhana) the appellant. They treated him badly. He was fed up with their cruel behaviour. On 6.9.2004, a petition was filed by him for divorce against the respondent. Due to compromise between them, the respondent came back to the appellant to reside with him. Thereafter, on 7.6.2005, she again left her matrimonia

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top