G.P.SINGH
Kanhaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
Phulan Dulaiya – Respondent
1. The plaintiff appellant's suit for specific performance was dismissed but a decree of Rs. 2,000/- was passed against the defendants. Plaintiff filed an appeal the prayer in the appeal was that his suit for specific performance ought to have been decreed by the trial Court. On 9th September 1974, a sum of Rs. 500/- was offered by the defendants as first instalment which was accepted by the plaintiff's counsel. A plea was raised by the defendants that in view of this acceptance of money by the plaintiff's counsel, the right to pursue the appeal of the appellant came to an end and that the appeal should be dismissed as an infructuous. The plaintiff pleaded that the money was accepted by his counsel under a mistake. This plea was negatived and the appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
Held: It is not necessary to decide whether the plaintiff's counsel accepted Rs. 500/- on 9th September 1974, under a mistake or otherwise. Even assuming that the amount was accepted as first instalment towards the payment of Rs. 2,000/- which was decreed by the trial Court. This Court is of opinion that the right to pursue the appeal did not come to an end. It is settled that in the absence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.