G.L.OZA
Bhurelal – Appellant
Versus
Balmukund – Respondent
The plaintiff appellant filed the suit on the allegation that the shop in question along with the land was taken on rent on 18-9-1965 by registered rent-deed for Rs. 9.0 p. per month. It was further alleged by the plaintiff-appellant that in a suit filed by the State and the Princess Usha Trust against the present plaintiff in the Court of the Additional District Judge where the respondent also was a defendant he filed, a written-statement denying the title of the present plaintiff appellant and therefore this suit was filed on the ground under section 12(1)(c) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act. The trial Court dismissed the suit holding that what was alleged in the written-statement by the respondent defendant did not amount to disclaimer of title and therefore no ground under section 12(1)(c) of the Act is made out. The learned lower appellate Court held that although the written-statement filed by the defendant-respondent amounts to disclaimer but the learned Judge maintained the dismissal of the suit on the ground that under section 12(1)(c) of the Act mere disclaimer is not enough. The plaintiff had further to allege that this disclaimer might affect
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.