SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(MP) 471

R.L.MURAB
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : N.P. Mittal
For the Respondent: B.L. Bhargava, Panel lawyer

Short Note :

1. On 16-5-1972 in the evening 14 persons were proceeding in five bullock carts to their village Khadera after seiling their grains in the market of Gohad. On the way, at about 9 p.m., near Kalla-ki-kuia, where there is a culvert and village Khathwa nearby, miscreants including Jagdish, Rudsingh, Nathu and Bhota way-led them and looted their cash, gold and Sliver ornaments. wrist-watch, goggles, clothes, etc. In the incident, Kaptan (P.W. 2), Gyaso (P.W. 3) and Harbilas (P.W. 21) were injured by the miscreants. The appellants thereafter decamped with the booty.

2. All the accused were arrested within a short time by the police, looted articles were also recovered from the accused. Accused and articles were identified.

3. Accused Rupsingh was convicted under section 394/34 IPC read with section 27 Arms Act While accused Moham was convicted and sentenced under section 27 of the Arms Act alone. All other 3 persons were found guilty of offence under section 393/34 IPC and were accordingly convicted by the trial Court. Hence this appeal.

4. Held: So far as it being night time, the evidence of the prosecution witnesses is that it was moon-lit night. Merely because of clouds, sca



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top