SHIVDAYAL, K.K.DUBE
Manmohan Singh Thakre – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of M. P. – Respondent
The petitioner, at all material times, was employed as a Patwari in tahsil Kawardha of District Durg. The services of the petitioner were temporary. He was served with one month's notice (Annexure R-2), dated 16-8-1971. Thereafter, by an order dated 9-9-1971 (Annexure R-1), the petitioner's services were terminated.
The petitioner had been dismissed from the Government service earlier while holding the post of a Mal Chaprasi.
Held : Under section 104 of the Code, the Collector has been designated the person who shall appoint a Patwari. Under section 22 of the Code, the Sub-Divisional Officer exercised such powers of a Collector as the State Government by notification directed. By Notification No 11429-CR-635VII N-2 published in the Madhya Pradesh Rajpatra dated 9-10-1959 and notification No. 13691-CR-770-VII-N (Rules), published in the Madhya Pradesh Rajpatra dated 1-10-1960, the State Government in exercise of the powers under section 22 of the Code directed all the Sub-Divisional Officers to exercise powers of a Collector under sub-section (2) of section 104 of the Code. There is, therefore, no contention in the submission that the Sub-Divisional Officer had no power to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.