SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(MP) 1036

S.C.SHARMA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Bai – Respondent


ORDER :

S.C. Sharma, J.

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, the writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of Writ Petition No. 7540/2013 are narrated hereunder. The petitioner before this Court has filed this present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dt. 24-2-2012, passed by the Grievance Redressal Authority in Appeal No. 1982/2006, Krishna Bai vs. Narmada Valley Development Authority.

2. Facts of the case reveal that the respondent No. 1 Krishna Bai submitted an application before the Commissioner, Rehabilitation/Field, Narmada Valley Development Authority in GRA Case No. 711-D/2006 and the application was rejected by the Commissioner by order dt. 26-7-2006. She has preferred an appeal before the Grievance Redressal Authority and the Grievance Redressal Authority has allowed her appeal and has directed the Narmada Valley Development Authority to grant all benefits of Narmada Water Award and NRR Policy including allotment of agricultural land or payment of SRP as per option. The State of Madhya Pradesh, being aggrie






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top