SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 1094

VANDANA KASREKAR
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Devesh Pratap Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Himanshu Mishra and Ankit Saxena
For the Respondent: Rajendra Kumar Singh

ORDER :

The petitioners have filed the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 19-5-2017 passed by 4th Civil Judge Class-I, Rewa in Civil Suit No. 23-A/2016 thereby rejecting the application submitted by the petitioners for amendment in the written statement.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent/original plaintiff has filed a civil suit for partition of the land in question, possession and also to declare the sale deed as null and void. The defendants/petitioners had filed written statement and denied the averments made in the plaint. During the pendency of the said civil suit, the petitioners filed an application under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code for amendment in the written statement. In the said application, the petitioners have submitted that the original plaintiff has filed a civil suit for declaration and partition and the written statement was filed to the effect that the property of Late Shri Arjun Singh situated at Khaduli, Mudariya, Beohari, District Shahdol is around 80 acres of land and the land bearing Khasra No. 3776 was also self acquired property of Late Shri Arjun Singh which has not






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top