HEMANT GUPTA, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Dharmendra Sonkar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
HEMANT GUPTA, CJ.
The challenge in the present intra-Court appeal is to an order passed by the learned Single Bench on 23-6-2017 in W.P. No. 8044/2017 whereby in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court rendered in Shweta Bhadauria v. State of M.P., 2016 MPU Online 28 : 2017 (1) MPJR 247, it was held that if an FIR is not registered on the basis of a complaint which discloses a cognizable offence, the remedy available to an aggrieved person is to take recourse to the provisions envisaged under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (For short “the Code”).
2. Learned counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the judgment rendered in Shweta Bhadoria (supra) is not correctly decided, as in the case of Lalita Kumari v. Government of U.P., 2013 MPU Online (S.C.) 4 : (2014) 2 SCC 1 the Supreme Court held that registration of an FIR is the mandatory duty of the police. Therefore, to ensure that the mandatory duty is carried by the Police, the interference of this Court is essential to secure rule of law. The relevant extract of the Constitution Bench judgment in Lalita Kumari (supra) read thus:
“120. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we hold : 120.1 R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.