SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(MP) 1115

VANDANA KASREKAR
Raju Ganesh Kamble – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Atul Nema
For the Respondent: Ashish Shroti, C.L. Sethi

JUDGMENT :

The petitioner has filed the present petition in the nature of quo warranto against respondent No. 5.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is an employee of Municipal Council, Nepa Nagar. He was appointed as Sub Engineer in the services of Municipal Council Nepa Nagar. Respondent No. 5 was appointed on the post of Assistant Grade-III vide order dated 26-7-2015. Thereafter, respondent No. 5 has been arrested by the police for the offences under sections 302, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Chief Municipal Officer seek guidance from the Divisional Deputy Director, Urban Administration. The Deputy Director wrote that action under Rule 53 of the M.P. Municipal Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Services) Rules, 1968 be taken against the petitioner (sic : Respondent No. 5). Accordingly, the CMO has passed the order dated 23-8-2005 thereby placing respondent No. 5 under suspension. Thereafter respondent No. 5 was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Burhanpur vide judgment dated 26-8-2008 with imprisonment of life. Against the said judgment, respondent No. 5 filed a criminal appeal No. 1931/2008 and in the said appeal this Court vide orde


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top