S.SAMVATSAR
GHANSHYAM – Appellant
Versus
KANHIYALAL – Respondent
S. Samvatsar, J.
Petitioner by Shri R.R. Chandrawade, Advocate.
Respondents No. 1 to 3 by Shri B.I. Mehta, Advocate.
Respondent No. 4 by Shri Anand Pathak, Govt. Advocate.
Heard.
This petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging order dated 7-3-2006 passed by the First Additional District Judge, Indore in Civil Appeal No. 22/2005, whereby the Appellate Court has confirmed the order dated 16-3-2005 passed by 7th Civil Judge Class-II, Indore in Civil Suit No. 61-A/2005. Thus, two Courts have rejected the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2, CPC refusing to grant injunction.
Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner has filed a suit in respect of agricultural lands bearing Survey Nos. 522/1, 967, 970/1, 966, 1145, 1152, 1418/1/99 total area 05.509 hectares situated at village Rau Tahsil and District Indore alleging that land in question is his ancestral property and he has 1/4th share in the property, therefore, the defendant No. 1 has no right to alienate the property. He along with plaint filed an application under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code, which is rejected by two Courts below. H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.