P.V.DIXIT, K.L.PANDEY
GWALIOR RAYON SILK MANUFACTURING (WEAVING) CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent
Dixit, C.J.
By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Company prays for the issue of an appropriate writ or direction restraining the opponents from making any assessment under the Indian Income Tax Act and from levying or collecting Income Tax from the Company for a period of twelve years from June 1949 in respect of income of the Weaving Division and for a period of twelve years from February 1954 in respect of the income of the Staple Fibre Section of the petitioner-Company.
The events leading to the supplicant's claim for exemption from taxation are that in order to promote the industrial development of the former Gwalior State and to facilitate the establishment of certain industries in the State, the Maharaja of Gwalior on the recommendation of his Minister for Industries, Commerce and Communications, made an order on 18-1-1947 exempting from any form of taxation for a period of twelve years the income of certain industries and factories which M/s. Birla Bros., Ltd., Gwalior, intended to establish in Gwalior State. Consequent to this order of the Ruler, an agreement was entered into between the Gwalior Government and M/s. Birla
Director of Endowments, Government of Hyderabad and Others Vs. Akram Ali
Thakur Amar Singhji Vs. State of Rajasthan
Maharaj Umeg Singh and Others Vs. The State of Bombay and Others
Virendra Singh and Others Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Behram Khurshed Pesikaka Vs. The State of Bombay
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and Another Vs. The State of Vindhya Pradesh
Dalmia Dadri Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax
Ameer-un-Nissa Begum and Others Vs. Mahboob Begum and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.