SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NEVASKAR, SAMVATSAR
Hooriya – Appellant
Versus
Munna – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chitale and Amarsingh, for Appellant
Rege and Vaidya, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :

SAMVATSAR, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs whose suit has been dismissed by the Civil Judge, 1st Class, Dewas.

2. The plaintiffs are real sisters, daughters, of one Kalekhan, now deceased and have brought this suit out of which the appeal arises, in the court of the civil Judge, 1st Class at Dewas against their brothers Munua and Daddu for partition of property left behind by their father Kalekhan. The defendants 3 to 7 and 8 to 11 are respectively the heirs of one Mangal and one Sayakhan, the deceased sons of the aforesaid Kalekhan.

2a. Kalekhan died about the year 1922-23 leaving behind his four sons and three daughters and some property consisting of agricultural land, houses and movables. The parties are Muhammadans and the plaintiffs have claimed that each one of them has got 1/11 share in the property left by their deceased father.

3. The defendant No. 1 filed his written; statement in which he admitted the whole claim of the plaintiffs whereas the defendants 3 to 11 have remained 'ex parte'. The suit is therefore contested by defendant No. 2 alone. The defendant No. 3 has in his written statement alleged that deceased Kalekhan had divided his assets during





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top