KHAN
Karansingh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
1. The accused has been convicted by the Additional District Magistrate, Bhind, under S. 193, I.P.C., for intentionally giving false evidence and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 100. His appeal against his conviction and sentence having been disallowed by the Sessions Judge, the accused has now filed this revision.
2. The charge against the accused is that in Criminal Case No. 304 of 1952, before the Committing Court, Gohad, as a prosecution witness he made a certain statement on 25-3-1953, and, that later on in the same case during the trial before the Sessions Court (Case No. 13 of 1953), Bhind, on 27-7-1953. he made a different statement altogether. Charges under Sections 193 and 194, I.P.C., were framed against the accused. While he was acquitted of an offence under S. 194, I.P.C., he was convicted under S. 193, I.P.C. only.
3. From the record it appears that the Sessions Judge, Bhind, made a complaint against the applicant under S. 476, Criminal P.C. and sent the applicant to the Additional District Magistrate for his being tried for an offence under S. 194, I.P.C. only. The Additional District Magistrate framed two charges against the pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.