SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHATURVEDI
Ramchandra – Appellant
Versus
Pannalal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rege, for Appellants; Sanghi, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

This is second appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit for accounts and profits of joint fields. The plaintiffs and the defendants represents two branches of a joint Hindu family whose common ancestor was Mohan Bhai. Mohan Bhai had two sons, Vithaldas and Kishanlal. So far as this suit is concerned Vithaldas had two sons Nanuram and Narayan who had issues. Narayans three sons Pannalal, Dhannalal and Babulal are first three defendants. Then the defendant No. 4 Ratanlal is the grandson of Nanuram. Kishanlals son Hiralal is the plaintiff who filed this suit.

He is, however, dead and the names of his three sons Ramchandra, Madanlal and Navnitlal were brought on record as legal representatives of the said Hiralal. The plaintiffs and the defendants were members of a joint Hindu family doing business in the name of Mohan Vitthal in Nisarpur of former Holkar State. In 1935 there was a partition of the joint family property and an arbitrator was appointed who gave an award in accordance with which certain release deeds were executed by the parties.

This partition is admitted by the defendants; but then they stated that this award was set aside by another award and the release deeds, espe
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top