J.P.GUPTA
Mohammad Haroon Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Shashista Parveen – Respondent
J.P. Gupta, J.
This petition under section 482 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 has been preferred by the applicants against the order dated 15.3.2013 passed by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh in Cr. Revision No. 97/2011 arising out of order dated 8.8.2011 passed by C.J.M. Damoh in Criminal case No. 1898/11, whereby cognizance of the offence under Section 498-A of the IPC & Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act was taken against the applicants.
2. The facts of the case in brief are that marriage of the applicant No. 1 was solemnised with the Respondent No. 1 on 5.11.2006. Applicant No. 2 and 3 are parents of the applicant No. 1 and applicants No. 4 and 5 are his brothers and all are residing together. Out of the wedlock, one daughter was born. On 24.3.2009, respondent No. 1 made a complaint at Police Station, Damoh to the effect that since 2006 applicants are harassing and torturing her in connection with demand of dowry. As a consequence thereof, applicants were called in the Parivar Paramarsh Kendra but they were not ready to change their behaviour, therefore, criminal complaint was filed on 15.7.2009 before the C.J.M. Damoh. The C.J.M. Damoh on the basis of the statements of
Bhaskar Lal Sharma & another v. Monica ((2009) 10 SCC 604
Geeta Mehrotra and another v. Stae of Uttar Pradesh ((2012)10 SCC 741)
National Bank of Oman v. Barakara Abdul Aziz & another reported in (2013) 2 SCC 488
Preeti Gupta v. State of Jharkhand ((2010) 7 SCC 667)
Sushil Kumar Sharma v. Union of India ((2005) 6 SCC 281)
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Sharaful Haque ((2005) 1 SCC 122)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.