SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Sanjay Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Iswar Chand Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri A. Choudhary, Counsel
For the Respondent: Shri A.S. Parihar, Counsel

ORDER :

G.S. AHLUWALIA, J.

1. This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking permission to compromise the case.

2. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present application in short are that the respondent filed a criminal complaint against the applicant for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act on the allegations that the applicant had given cheques which stood bounced.

3. The applicant was convicted by the Trial Court and being aggrieved by the judgment and sentence passed by the Trial Court, the applicant filed a Criminal Appeal, which too was dismissed.

4. Thereafter, Criminal Revisions Nos.2209/2016 and 2211/2016 were preferred before this Court, which too were dismissed by this Court by judgment dated 28-3-2017.

5. It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that after the dismissal of the Criminal Revisions, the parties have settled their dispute and now the complainant wants to withdraw his complaints.

6. It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that the Supreme Court in the case of K. Subramanian Vs. R. Rajathi reported in (2010) 15 SCC 352 had allowed the review application and had permitted the parties to compound the o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top