ORDER

1. Regard being had to the similitude of the controversy involved in the have been heard analogously and disposed of by this singular order.

For the sake of convenience, facts in Writ Petition No. 22644 of 2017 have been dealt with.

Pursuant to the notice inviting tender dated 29.3.2006 (Annexure P-2) by respondent No. 3, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Indore for allotment of shop to run canteen situated in their premises, petitioner had also participated and submitted his bid. The bid was accepted vide letter dated 15.6.2006 (Annexure P-3) as he was the highest bidder. A lease deed was executed on 8.1.2007 (Annexure P-4). Clause 9 provides for renewal thereof and the same is quoted below:

9- ;g fd] fdjk,nkjh dh vof/k vkf/kiR; dh fnukad ls rhu o"kZ ds fy;s jgsXkh] ftlesa o`f) ifjofrZr ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds vuqlkj fdjk, dh nj dk iqufoZyksdu djrs gq, izpfyr 'krkZuqlkj Ñf"k mit eaMh lfefr vkoaVu fu;e 2005 vuqlkj fd;k tk ldsxkA

As per terms and conditions thereof, initially the lease deed was executed for a period of three years.

It was further extended by respondent No. 3 for one year vide letter dated 6.10.2009. Petitioner before expiry of lease period had applied for renewal of the le