SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 333

VANDANA KASREKAR
Vineet Huriya – Appellant
Versus
Akansha Huriya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ajay Mishra for petitioner.

ORDER

1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 26.6.2019 and 9.7.2019 passed by the 1st Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore.

2. The petitioner has filed a petition under section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce. The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized on 22.2.2014 at Indore with the respondent who is presently resident of Bangkok, Thailand. On 7.12.2018, notices were issued but the same returned unserved. Thereafter, again notices were issued on 4.2.2019 through legal cell inter security second division, Government of India. Thereafter, in the month of May, 2019, notices were issued, but all the effects for service has drain into the waste. Ultimately on 26.6.2019, the petitioner has filed an application under section 151 of C.P.C praying therein that the notices be served through email, facebook, messenger or through other social media. The Court below, vide order dated 26.6.2019, has rejected the said application on the ground that as authenticate email ID or other ID have not been provided, therefore, notices cannot be issued.. Thereafter, the petitioner had again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top