SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 726

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Manoj Kumar Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Deepak Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner: Shri Pallav Tripathi, learned counsel
For the respondent: Shri Anshu Gupta, learned counsel

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the order dated 26.9.2017 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Sheopur, whereby the order dated 9.1.2017 passed by learned trial Court has been confirmed and application filed under Section 91 of CrPC preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.

2. The facts in short are that a private complaint was preferred under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act by the respondent, wherein it was pleaded by the respondent that the petitioner had borrowed Rs.8.00 lacs from the respondent on 25.7.2012 and for repayment of such loan a post-dated cheque No. 012559 dated 25.8.2012 was given by the petitioner. The said cheque was presented before the bank and the same was dishonoured, hence the complaint was preferred. The petitioner preferred an application under Section 91 of CrPC for calling sale deed which was executed by Premlata in favour of the respondent. The petitioner has signed as witness in the said sale deed. The cheque in question was given as security for payment of sale consideration, that cheque has been misused. Since the sale deed reflects the fact that cheque was given as secu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top