VIVEK RUSIA
Sumana Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. The petitioners have filed the present petition seeking police protection. According to them, they are major and performed their marriage, but they are receiving threat from their parents.
2. If the petitioners are major and entered into the marriage voluntarily, then they should not be harassed by any one, just because they have objection with their marriage. In future, if the petitioners receive any threat or fear to their life from anyone order to avoid any harassment, the petitioners are certainly entitled for police protection.
3. That, in case of Lata Singh v. State of U.P. Another : AIR 2006 SC 2522, the apex Court has observed as under :
“this is free and democratic country and once a person becomes a major he or she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter caste of inter religious marriage the maximum they can do is that they can cut-off social relation with the son or daughter, but they can give threats or commit of instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person undergoes such inter caste or inter religious relationship marriage. We therefore direct that the administrative/ police authorities throughout the country will see t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.