VIVEK RUSIA, AMAR NATH KESHARWANI
Dilipraj – Appellant
Versus
Rekha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Appellant-Husband has filed F.A. No. 1273/2014 under section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the judgment and decree dated 16.9.2014 whereby the Family Court, Ratlam has dismissed a petition filed under section 13(1)(1-a) (1-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Appellant-Husband has filed F.A. No. 352/2020 under section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the judgment and decree dated 8.1.2020 whereby the Family Court, Ratlam has allowed a petition filed by the respondent /wife under section 25(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
The common facts of both appeals are as under:
1. The marriage of the appellant/husband and respondent/wife was solemnized at Mandsaur under the Hindu customs and rituals on 28.4.1990. According to the appellant/husband, after one year of the marriage, the respondent/wife left his house on 31.5.1991 thereafter he made various efforts to bring her back but she did not return to his house. The appellant filed a First application for dissolution of marriage before the Civil Court on 23.6.1992 which was registered as HMA No. 58-A/1992. Simultaneously, the respondent/wife has also filed an application under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA No. 45
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.