SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 10

SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Adityaraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Saraf with Ms. Shraddha Dixit, and Ramesh C. Gangare for respective appellants; Aakash Sharma,
Government Advocate for respondent/State.

JUDGEMENT

1. This judgement will dispose of Criminal Appeal No.854/2012 and Criminal Appeal No.819/2012, which are arising out of the common judgement dated 6.7.2012. On the joint request of the parties, these appeals were analogously heard and decided by this common judgement.

2. Both the appellants/accused have filed these appeals under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “the Cr.P.C.”) being aggrieved by the judgement dated 6.7.2012 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rajgarh in S.T. No.165/2011, whereby learned trial Court, has convicted and sentenced the appellants as under :-

S. No.

Conviction

Sentence

 

 

 

 

Imprisonment

Fine amount

Additional imprisonment in default of payment of fine

Appellant – Adityaraj Singh

1

302 of IPC

Life imprisonment

Rs.20,000/-  

RI for 03 years

2

25 (1B)(a) of Arms Act

RI for 03 years

Rs.5,000/-

RI for 06 months

Appellant – Mahendra Singh

1

324 of IPC

RI for 01 year

Rs.5,000/-

RI for 06 months

3. Prosecution story, in nutshell is that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top