VIVEK AGARWAL
Balak Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sonu Barman – Respondent
ORDER
1. This Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, being aggrieved of order dated 28.1.2020, passed in Civil Suit No.723-A/2018, by learned Civil Judge, Junior section, Jabalpur.
2. Petitioner’s contention is that respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for specific performance and in the alternative had claimed for refund of the advance paid by him. Plaintiff paid Court Fees on Rs.1 Lac i.e. the amount which was sought to be refunded and did not pay the Court Fees in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement for specific performance of which was sought.
3. Petitioner had moved an application under Order 7 rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CPC for short). That application was allowed vide order dated 2.12.2019 and plaintiff was directed to pay Court Fees as per the terms and conditions of the agreement on Rs.4,26,000/- which was the subject matter of the agreement. Thereafter, case was fixed on 24.1.2020 when instead of asking the plaintiff to first pay the Court Fees in accordance with the earlier order dated 2.12.2019, application under Order 6 rule 17 CPC was taken and defendant was given time
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.