VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Shankarlal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. This is a petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the order dated 9.1.2023 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Alot, Dist. Ratlam in Sessions Trial No.05/2016 whereby the application filed under section 311 Cr.P.C. for recall of witness in Crime No.276/2015 by the respondent prosecution has been allowed.
2. The applicants are accused person in a complaint filed by Narsingh for commission of offences under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC. The Magistrate had sent the same for investigation to the police.
3. Counsel for the applicants submits that after closure of evidence of prosecution witnesses twice and after recording the statement of accused under section 311, an application has been filed to produce handwriting expert and other documents and to recall investigation officer for evidence has been erroneously allowed. The said application ought to have been rejected by the trial Court as the same was filed by the prosecution to fill up the lacuna which is not permissible under the provisions of section 311 Cr.P.C. To bolster his submissions, he has placed reliance on an order dated 20.1.2016 passed in Cr.R. No.1626/2015 by Coordinate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.