SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 54

PRANAY VERMA
Bajesingh – Appellant
Versus
Seelabai – Respondent


Advocates:
Manuraj Singh for appellants.

ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the appellants is heard on the question of admission.

2. This appeal under section 100 of the CPC has been preferred by defendants 1 and 2 /appellants against the judgment and decree dated 3.09.2022 passed in RCA No. 67 of 2019 by the Ist Additional District Judge, Narsinghgarh, District Rajgarh affirming the judgment and decree dated 30.1.2019 passed in RCS No. 400026/2016 by the IInd Civil Judge Class-II, Narsinghgarh, District Rajgarh whereby the claim of plaintiff/respondent No.1 for possession of the suit land and permanent injunction had been decreed and their counter claim for declaration of title and permanent injunction had been dismissed.

3. As per the plaintiff she is the owner of the suit land and defendants 1 and 2 are her neighbors and have forcibly taken possession of the same. Defendants 1 and 2 had instituted an action in the Court of Civil Judge, Class-II Narsinghgarh against her which was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 13.8.2015 for want of evidence after which they have illegally taken possession of the suit land. She instituted proceedings under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against defendants 1 and 2 but has b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top