SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 109

VIVEK AGARWAL
Batasiya Maravi – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Arun Kumar Singh for petitioner; Manas Mani Verma, Government Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 3/State.

ORDER

1. This petition is filed assailing the order dated 13.2.2023 passed by the Superintendent of Police Mandla rejecting claim of the present petitioner to get family pension on account of death of Uttam singh Maravi on 7.9.2021.

2. Rejection order makes a mention of the fact that Shri Uttam Singh Maravi had first marriage with Smt. Rain Kumari and in his service book name of Smt. Rain Kumari is mentioned. Even in the pension case joint photographs of Late Shri Uttam Singh Maravi and Smt. Rain Kumari have been affixed.

3. Petitioner's contention is that late Shri Uttam Singh had divorced his first wife Smt. Rain Kumari and Rain Kumari had sworn an affidavit before the notary public on 7.10.2014 to the affect that she had taken divorce in 1998-99 as per tribal customs and traditions which has legal sanctity. She further deposed that they were staying separately for last 15 years and she has no claim on the body and property of Shri Uttam Singh and both are living separately.

4. It is submitted that petitioner had contacted marriage with Shri Uttam Singh Maravi on 15.5.2000 and this fact is mentioned in the form which was submitted by Uttam Singh Maravi in the form of Exhibit P-5. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top