R. J. BHAVE
MUNNALAL TLWARL – Appellant
Versus
LAXMINAKAYAN LOHIA – Respondent
ORDER – The application filed by the appellant before the Rent Controlling Authority under section 21 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’) was dismissed by the Rent Controlling Authority. The appeal before the District Judge, Jabal-pur, was also unsuccessful. Hence this second appeal.
2. In the application filed before the Rent Controlling Authority the appellant, who is the landlord, had prayed that the tenant be ordered to deposit the monthly rent of January 1966 without prejudice to the rights of the appellant. Both the lower Courts came to the conclusion that there was no provision under the Act conferring jurisdiction on the Rent Controlling Authority to entertain the kind of application filed by the landlord.
3. Shri R. P. Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant, urged before me that sub-section (1) of section 24 of the Act makes it obligatory on the tenant to pay the rent to the landlord on the day he is bound to do so under the contract of tenancy or, in the absence of such a contract, by the 15th day of the month next following the month for which it is payable. Shri Tiwari says that when an obligation is created, there
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.