SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Mangla – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, a returned candidate, who was elected as Sarpanch of Idaratpura, Tehsildar and District Khargone against the order dated 16.12.2022, passed by the respondent No.3/Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Khargone in Revision No.45/2022-202,3 wherein, in an Election Petition filed by the respondent No.3 challenging the election of the petitioner, the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 rule 11 of the CPC has been rejected.
2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Idaratpura, Tehsildar and District Khargone on 14.7.2022, which was challenged by the respondent No. 3 in an Election Petition preferred under section 122 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam 1993. In the aforesaid proceedings, an application under Order 7 rule 11 of the CPC was filed by the petitioner on various grounds, inter alia that the caste certificate of the petitioner, who belongs to a Scheduled Caste cannot be challenged in the election petition.
3. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.