IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, Pranay Verma, JJ.
Meet Lalwani Legal Heir of Late Mrs Amita Lalwani – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 2 (1) Indore – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 9697 of 2022
Decided On : 23-11-2023
Income Tax - Notice Issued to Deceased Assessee - Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 148, Section 148A(d) - The judgment discusses the validity of a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the name of a deceased assessee. The court holds that such a notice is null and void as it lacks jurisdiction. The judgment also highlights the legal principles related to jurisdictional notices and the obligations of legal representatives in such cases.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, as the legal heir of the original assessee, received a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 seeking reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2018-19. Despite informing about the death of the original assessee and providing the death certificate, a notice was issued again in the name of the deceased assessee. The petitioner challenged the notice on the grounds that it was issued to a dead person and lacked jurisdiction.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the notice issued in the name of the deceased assessee was unenforceable in the eyes of the law. It held that legal heirs are under no statutory obligation to intimate the death of the assessee to the revenue. The court quashed the notice and all consequential proceedings arising from it.
Issues: The main issue was whether the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, issued in the name of a deceased assessee, was enforceable in law.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that a notice issued in the name of a dead person is null and void, as it lacks jurisdiction. It also highlighted that legal heirs are not under a statutory obligation to intimate the death of the assessee to the revenue.
Final Decision: The court quashed the notice dated 31.03.2022 and the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2018-19, and prohibited all actions in furtherance thereto.
ORDER
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J. - Heard finally with the consent of parties.
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(referred to as 'the Act of 1961' hereinafter) for the assessment year 2018-19 dated 31.03.2022 passed in case No. ITBA/AST/S/148_12021-22/1042404876(1) [Annexure P-3] as well as order u/S 148A(d) of the Act of 1961 dated 31.03.2022[Annexure P-4] for the assessment year 2018-19.
2. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner who was the legal heir of the original assessee received a notice DIN NO. 1041169255(1) dated 21.03.2022 from the respondent no.1 under Section 148A(b) of the Act of 1961 seeking reopening of assessment of the assessee as income chargeable to tax for the Assessment Year 2018-19 has escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 147 of the Act of 1961 and the petitioner is required to show cause as to why a notice u/S 148 of the Act of 1961 should not be issued. The petitioner filed a reply to the said notice through his Chartered Accountant informing that the original assessee Mrs. Amita Lalwani had expired on 07.07.2021 and also annexed a copy of the death certificate. Subsequently, notice u/S 148 of the Act of 1961 dated 31.03.2022 was issued again in the name of original assessee who is dead despite informing about her death alongwith her death certificate. In the said notice, it was stated that certain income of the deceased assessee had escaped assessment for the Assessment Year 2018-19 and the respondent proposed to re-assess the income for the said assessment year. The said notice was accompanied by an order under Clause (d) of Section 148A of the Act of 1961 where reference of petitioner as legal heir of the deceased assessee has been given. It has been mentioned in the order that assesssee has made investment of Rs. 47,32,641/- to purchase two immovable properties during the period under consideration. For verification of the above investment, the respondent has taken accord of the competent authority and issued show cause notice u/S 148A(b) of the Act of 1961. In response to the said show cause notice, the legal heir of the assessee has filed death certificate of the original assessee. However, the legal heir of the original assessee has not given sufficient explanation about the investment made to purchase the immovable property and also mentioned that since the original assessee has died, therefore, notice is issued to her son. In the absence of any justifiable explanation, regarding investment in the immovable properties, it has been held that assessee has not disclosed the income of Rs. 47,32,641 for the A.Y. 2018-19 which is also chargeable to tax and the same has escaped the assessment. Hence the present petition is filed.
3 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that an essential condition to issue notice u/S 148 of the Act of 1961 is that the notice be issued to the person who is alive and the same cannot be issued to a dead person. Since issuance of notice u/S 148 of the Act of 1961 is the foundation for reopening of an assessment, then such notice should ought to have been issued in the name of correct person which is a condition precedent to the impugned notice being valid in law. In support of his contention, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of High Court of Gujarat in the case of Chandreshbhai Jayantibhai Patel Vs. The Income Tax Officer reported in (2019) 413 ITR 276 wherein it has been held as under:
"18.The question that therefore arises for consideration is whether the notice under section 148 of the Act issued against the deceased assessee can be said to be in conformity with or according to the intent and purposes of the Act. In this regard, it may be noted that a notice under section 148 of the Act is a jurisdictional notice, and existence of a valid notice under section 148 is a condition precedent for exercise of juri
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the notice issued on a dead person under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is null and void, and all consequential proceedings in the na....
The jurisdictional requirement under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be fulfilled, and there is no statutory obligation for legal heirs to intimate the death of the assessee to the Reven....
Notices issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act to deceased persons are invalid, necessitating issuance to legal representatives for valid assessment proceedings.
The foundational requirement of issuing notice to the correct person is a condition precedent to the validity of the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Assessment proceedings initiated against a deceased taxpayer are invalid if notices are issued in the name of the deceased and legal representatives are not recognized.
Notice u/s 148 issued to deceased assessee is invalid and void ab initio; assessment thereon quashed. No statutory duty on legal heirs to intimate death; mere return filing does not validate jurisdic....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.