SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 723

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Takhat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vilas Tikhe, Advocate, Purshottam Tanwar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - Heard on I.A.No.5272/2023, first application under Section 389(1) of CrPC for grant of suspension of sentence filed on behalf of appellants No. 3, 9, and 11, namely, Parasram, Bhikam Singh and Harisingh respectively.

2. The Trial Court has convicted the aforesaid appellants under Sections 147 of IPC and sentenced to undergo three months RI with fine of Rs.100/, under Section 148 of IPC and sentenced to undergo six months imprisonment with fine of Rs.300/-, under Section 323/149 (three count) of IPC and sentenced to undergo six-six months RI with fine of Rs.300/- (three count) and under Section 307/149 (two count) of IPC and sentenced to undergo 5-5 years RI with fine of Rs.1,000/- (two count) with default stipulation, vide judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.11.2022 passed in Sessions Trial No.159/2016 by Additional Sessions Judge, Lateri, District Vidisha.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that it has been alleged against the appellants No. 3,9 and 11 that at the time of incident, they along with other co-accused persons armed with Lathi and Farsi assaulted the complainant's father Preetam and uncle Pratap Singh and w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top