RAVI MALIMATH, MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
Rahul Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Reetu Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant appeal under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27.1.2010 passed by the Sixth Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Bhind in HMA case No.19 of 2009, whereby an application preferred under section 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage either void/voidable has been rejected.
2. Short facts of the case are that the marriage was solemnized between the appellant and the respondent on 2.5.2009 as per the Hindu religious rites and customs at village Urai Road Mihona Tehsil Lahar District Bhind. After the marriage, the respondent-wife lived with the appellant-husband till 8.5.2009. Thereafter, she went to her maternal home and returned back to her matrimonial home on 11.5.2009 and lived there only for 7 days. During that period the respondent-wife had denied the appellant the marital happiness. The respondent-wife told the appellant-husband that she is already married to one Vivek Mishra, therefore, she cannot live with him and she gave the appellant a mobile No. 9753936690 of Vivek Mishra and made the appellant talk with him on the mobile, where Vivek Mis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.