SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 564

ROHIT ARYA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Ami Prabal, Deputy Advocate General for appellant/State;
Ajay Singh Raghuvanshi for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under section 100 CPC by defendants/State is directed against the confirming judgment and decree dated 6.12.2008 passed in Civil Appeal No.2-A/2007 by Additional District Judge, Pichhore District Shivpuri by which affirmed the judgment and decree dated 21.2.2005 passed in Civil Suit No.118/2003 by Civil Judge, Class-II, Khaniyadana, District Shivpuri. Plaintiffs/respondents suit for declaration and permanent injunction has been decreed.

2. Facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are to the effect that the plaintiffs have filed a suit inter alia contending that the suit land; agricultural land falling in survey Nos. 6 area 3.35 hectare, 27 area 0.15 hectare, 28 area 0.14 hectare, 53 area 0.44 hectare, 57 area 1.26 hectare, 75 area 1.77 hectare, 81 area 3.12 hectare, total area 10.23 hectare situated in village Bhudera, Tahsil Khaniyadana, District Shivpuri (for short, 'the suit land') is ancestral property and plaintiffs are in possession thereof and doing cultivation and harvesting crops. As defendants No.1 to 3 intend to take forcible possession p












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top