SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(MP) 461

S.K.PALO
Madhav Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. The petitioners preferred this revision under section 397 read with section 401 of CrPC assailing the order dated 3.5.2016, passed by 4th ASJ, Sagar, in S.T. No.92/2016, whereby charges have been framed for the offences punishable under sections 148, 326/149, 323/149, 294, 506 Part-II of IPC (against applicant No.1-Madhav) and offences under sections 147, 326/149, 294, 506 Part-II of IPC (against applicants No.2 to 7).

2. The main contention of the petitioners is, that as per the report victim Bhavsingh was attacked by 'axe' and he sustained grievous injury, but the medical report shows that Bhavsingh received injuries by hard and blunt object. The

x-ray report of his hands shows fracture of left radius and ulna bone and right ulna bone. It is also claimed that these injuries of Bhavsingh has been caused by 'lathi' (wooden stick), as per the prosecution case. Hence, offence under section 326 of IPC is not made out.

3. Learned P. L. for respondent/State submits that the injuries received by Bhavsingh is grievous in nature and was caused by axe, which is a dangerous weapon/instrument.

4. On perusal of the record available and the case diary, it is claimed that injuries have b














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top