ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA
Ramcharan – Appellant
Versus
Damodar – Respondent
1. The appellant/plaintiff has filed this second appeal under section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 3.2.2016 passed by First Additional District Judge, Satna in regular Civil Appeal No.31-A/2015, whereby the judgment and decree dated 8.7.2014 passed by Civil Judge, Class-I, Satna, (hereinafter referred to as 'trial Court') in Civil Suit No.45-A/2010 has been affirmed and confirmed and the suit filed by the appellant for declaration of title, possession and permanent injunction has been dismissed.
2. The facts giving rising to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that the plaintiff instituted a suit before trial Court, stating that the father of the plaintiff/appellant, Sahdev was the owner of the disputed land Khasra No.231/2 area 0.031 hect. situated in Village Kherbasani, Tahsil Maihar, District Satna. In his life time he remained in possession of the land and after his death plaintiff Ramcharan became owner and is in continuous possession of the land. This land has never been sold by Sahdev to Purushottam. The sale deed dated 5.4.1962 alleged to have been executed by Sahdev in favour of Purushottam is null and void as f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.