SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(MP) 1243

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bhawani Singh, A.K. Mishra, JJ.
Lachmandas – Petitioner
Versus
State of M.P. – Respondent
Civil Revn. No. 742 of 1994 (J)
Decided On : 23-03-2000

Headnote:Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (M.P.) – S. 7 – B(1) (a) and 7 – B(1) proviso – period of limitation for filing dispute before Tribunal – commences from date of decision of final authority i.e. Superintending Engineer – dispute not decided within six months – Tribunal may be approached within one year thereafter.

        Short Note

       within a period of one and half year. ,The applicant had approached the! nbunal on February 9, 1993. Therefore, it can be safely stated that the Tribunal has been approached within the statutory period and the contention to the contrary has no force. No decision to the contrary has been brought to our notice in the course of hearing.

       Consequently, the revision is allowed, the impugned order of the Tribunal dated April 8, 1994, is set aside and the case is remanded to the Tribunal for consideration and decision on merit. The parties shall bear their own costs.

       N, Nagrath, Panel Lawyer for State.

Lachmandas vs State of M. P. - 2000 Supreme(MP) 1243
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top