IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
T.S. Doabia, J.
Rambharosa - Petitioner
Versus
State of M.P. - Respondent
W.P. No. 537 of 1995 (G)
Decided On : 24-07-1995
Short Note
1. Heard.
2. The only point which has been raised at the time of argument is that the question as to whether Rule 3 (2) of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualifications for Membership) Rules, 1991 are mandatory or not. This matter was considered by this Court in Writ Petition No. 47 of 1995 [1995 (2) Vidhi Bhasvar 309] decided on 28.3.1995. and Writ Petition No. 154 of 1995, decided on the same date. It was held that unless and untill the petitioner complies with the requirement of Rule 3 (2) of Rules, no decision on merits can be given.
3. The Officer adjudicating upon the matter took note of this objection, but has not given any decision.
4. In this view of the matter, the respondent No.3 is directed to re – decide the matter. The question as to whether Rule 3 (2) of the Rules is mandatory or not would be decided first. Annexure P/1 is quashed. A fresh order in accordance with law be passed, Copies of aforementioned decision be produced before the Election Court.
5. Disposed of accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.