IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
P.C. PATHAK, J.
Mangilal – Appellant
Vs.
M.P.E.B. Jabalpur – Respondent
M.A. No. 163 of 1985 (I);
Decided on : 18-07-1986
(2) Evidence Act, 1872 – S.60 – hearsay evidence – is of no value.
Short Note
1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs whose application for permission to sue as indigent persons was rejected.
2. The plaintiffs filed a suit of damages of Rs.25000/ – for death of their son by coming in contact with the live wire of electricity attached to a pole belonging to the respondent, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board. The appellants stated that they are not in position to pay Court fees required for the suit.
3. Held: Appellant No.1 entered the witness – box and he stated that he is working as a labourer and his income is not more than Rs.4/ – per day. In cross – examination be admitted that be has a Kachcha house but its value is not more Rs.1,000/•. As against this, the respondent examined one Janardan and Brijlal who stated that the value of the appellant's house is about Rs. 20,000/ – that of one Bigha land Rs. 10,000/ – and price of two buffaloes is Rs.3,000/ – . However, these witnesses admitted in cross – examination that they have no personal knowledge and their statement is based on information received from village people. Under the circumstances evidence led by the respondent is based on hearsay. There is no material on record to disbelieve the statement of the appellants and their witnesses. I am of the opinion that the appellants have established that they are indigent persons and are not in position to pay the required Court – fees.
Appeal allowed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.