SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 538

S.C.SHARMA
Rekha W/o Ghanshyam – Appellant
Versus
Kanhaiyalal S/o Amarsingh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Nitin Phadke
For the Respondent: Mr. Bhagwan Singh

JUDGMENT :

Arguments heard.

The present Second Appeal u/S. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed against the judgment dated 20/12/1983 passed in C.S. No. 146-A/1971 (Kanhaiyalal Vs. Madanlal and one another) by which the trial Court has decreed the suit for specific performance of the contract.

2. The first appellate Court has dismissed the appeal of the defendants vide judgment dated 29/7/1992 passed in C.A. No. 34-A/1986, against which the present appeal has been filed.

3. Facts of the case reveal that the suit was filed by the respondent – plaintiff Kanhaiyalal for specific performance of the contract against the defendants – Madanlal and his wife Smt. Ramkunwarbai, both are deceased and now they are represented by their legal representatives. Facts of the case further reveal that the property in question i.e., land bearing Survey No. 205/1, Area 5.13 Acre was purchased by the defendants from one Kishan s/o Hira on 17/2/1971. It was stated in the plaint that in the month of February, 1971 as the defendants were in need of money, therefore, they have entered into an oral agreement to sell the suit land to the plaintiff for a sum of Rs.8,000/-; out of which Rs.3000/- was p

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top