SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 612

SUJOY PAUL
Arun Kumar Brahmin – Appellant
Versus
Maanwati – Respondent


Advocates:
Aditya Adhikari with Abhijeet Bhowmic for petitioners;
Umesh Shrivastav for respondents No. 1 and 2;
Abhinav Jain, Government Advocate for respondent No.7.

ORDER

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 20.11.2017 (Annxure P-1) whereby the application filed by the petitioners/ defendants under Order 14 rules 1 and 2 CPC is dismissed by the Court below.

2. The admitted facts between the parties are that in the instant civil suit filed for declaration of title and nullifying the sale deeds, the petitioners/ defendants initially filed an application under Order 7 rule 11 CPC for dismissal of the suit on the ground of limitation. The Court below by order dated 27.2.2015 rejected the said application and said order of Court below, in absence of any further challenge, has attained finality. The petitioners defendants after completion of pleadings and framing of issues, filed an application dated 7.9.2017 (Annexure P-5) with a prayer to decide issue No. 3 as a preliminary issue.

3. Shri Aditya Adhikari, learned Senior counsel contends that issue No.3 is relating to limitation and goes to the root of the matter. The Court below should have decided the said issue as a preliminary issue. Reliance is placed on Pandurang Dhondi Chougule v. Maruti Hari Jadhav and others [AIR 1966 SC153











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top