SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 637

MUHAMMED SHAMIM, GIRISH TAMHANE
Nidhi Gujral – Appellant
Versus
Mahakali Housing Cooperative Society – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Vajpai for appellant; S.C. Dwivedi for respondent.

vkns'k

1- izdj.k ds Rf; laf{kIr% bl izdkj Gs fd izR;FkhZ Ø- 1 egkdkyh x`g fuekZ.k lgdkjh laLFkk e-iz- lgdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 9 varxZr iath—r lgdkjh laLFkk Gsa vihykFkhZ }kjk fnukad 25-4-1990 dks izR;FkhZ laLFkk esa izos'k 'kqYd ,oa va'k jkf'k tek dj fof/kor laLFkk dh lnL;rk izkIr dh rFkk rRi'pkr~ Hkw[kaM 'kqYd Vu; jkf'k;k¡ tek djk, tkus ds I'pkr~ vihykFkhZ@oknh vuqlkj izfroknh@izR;FkhZ }kjk oknh ds i{k esa 22-7-2001 dks xzke ckofM+;kdyk Hkksiky es fLFkr Hkwfe [kljk uacj 11@02 esa O;oLkkf;d Hkw[kaM 2160 oxZ QhV dk izkFkfed vkoaVu oknh ds i{k esa fd;k x;k FkkA fdUrq izfroknh@izR;FkhZ }kjk oknh dks lnL;rk ofj"Brk vuqlkj fu/kkZfjr vkcafVr O;olkf;d Hkw[kaM dk u rks vkf/kiR; fn;k x;k vkSj u gh mldh jftLVªh djkbZ xbZ oknh }kjk ,d ifjokn ftyk miHkksDrk Qksje Hkksiky ds le{k izLrqr fd;k x;k miHkksDrk Qksje }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 31-11-2004 ds I'pkr~ Hkh oknh dks okafNr O;olkf;d Hkw[kaM iznku dj jftLVªh u fd, tkus ls oknh }kjk vihy e-iz- jkT; miHkksDrk izfrrks"k.k vk;ksx ds le{k izLrqr dh xbZA U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k l{ke U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj ldus ds fu.Kz; ds ikyu esa vihykFkhZ@oknh }kjk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 64 varxZr iath;d lgdkjh laLFkk,sa Hkksiky ds le{k fookn izLrqr fd;k x;k tks vf/kfu;e







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top