SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 765

J.K.MAHESHWARI, SUBODH ABHYANKAR
Aryansh Singh Bhadoria – Appellant
Versus
Anshika Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Akshay Pawar for appellant.

JUDGMENT

Abhyankar, J.--1. This first appeal has been filed by the appellant under section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment dated 14.9.2017 passed by the First Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhopal in Civil Suit No. 1223-A/2016, whereby the suit filed by the appellant-husband under section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short “Hindu Marriage Act”) has been dismissed.

2. In a nutshell, the case before the trial Court was that a suit under section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed by appellant Aryansh Singh Bhadoria of Bhopal at Family Court, Bhopal against his wife Anshika Singh, a resident of Raibareily (UP) on the ground that their marriage was solemnized on 14.2.2015 at Bhopal as per the Hindu rites, but could not be consummated on account of unwillingness on the part of the respondent-wife Smt. Anshika Singh to perform her part of the marital obligation i.e. have physical relations. It was further stated in the aforesaid application that the respondent-wife had an affair with her boyfriend and she was forced to solemnize the said marriage with the appellant by her family members. However, subsequently after the marriage s

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top